tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post116077729025819706..comments2024-03-22T03:28:24.897-04:00Comments on Recording Industry vs The People: RIAA Drops Wilke Case in Chicagoraybeckermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-1160977471991448792006-10-16T01:44:00.000-04:002006-10-16T01:44:00.000-04:00"p2pnet.net had called the Wilke case yet another ..."p2pnet.net had called the Wilke case yet another RIAA blunder."<BR/><BR/>So true!Legit Freebies Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00326581293343328574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-1160884239276509412006-10-14T23:50:00.000-04:002006-10-14T23:50:00.000-04:00even if judgment had been granted to Wilke, there'...even if judgment had been granted to Wilke, there's no binding precedent, because federal district court judgments are not binding on any other court. So, it wouldn't have mattered in any case.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04274264430943588037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-1160837703426179032006-10-14T10:55:00.000-04:002006-10-14T10:55:00.000-04:00It is a good thing.It is a good thing.raybeckermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-1160837002042021292006-10-14T10:43:00.000-04:002006-10-14T10:43:00.000-04:00Ray said: "But it's still a good thing."I object t...Ray said: "<I>But it's still a good thing.</I>"<BR/><BR/>I object to that finding someway if you allow me to do so.<BR/><BR/>I agree that this outcome might be good for Paul -the stress that such a lawsuit brings when mutibillion dollar "organised (crime) [pleaded guilty of pricefixing!] music"-corporations send their "attack dogs" like Mr. Krichbaum or Mr. R.L.G.after you is something I would not wish my worst enemy.<BR/><BR/>BUT<BR/>that this is yet (officialy) another "the accused must pay for himself "-case is bad for the overall cause!<BR/><BR/>Even if Mrs. Sapier could have arranged something financialy in favour of her client Mr. Wilke ( I doubt that it would be 50.000 USD), such an "secret" arangement is counterproductive for the overall cause.<BR/>The RIAA will simply continue to "litigate" money with their SS-Center, they will simply continue to ruin the lives of Consumers/Customers with their false claims, their unreliable and false "investigations".<BR/><BR/>They will not stop their "sue 'em all"-terror and be more carefull whom they terrorize if there are no official rulings by judges that they must pay every god dam dollar that an wrongfully accused defendant must have paid in legal expenses.<BR/>This ~50.000 USD claim in this other case is a good referencepoint IMO. <BR/>I truely believe it is necessary that these criminal "organised music" must risk in every case they bring that they will loose so much money for defendants attorney fees that they will THINK before they use their automated money extorting business of SS-Center and Lawyers like Mr. Krichbaum!<BR/><BR/>(Disclaimer: I don't really can speak english like i wish I could, if you are with those criminal music cartel and you feeled pissed by this comment ask me what I wanted to say in my motherlanguage german before suing me for anything)Alter_Fritzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10861406779872744163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-1160794159214254082006-10-13T22:49:00.000-04:002006-10-13T22:49:00.000-04:00Yes it is true that a settlement is not a judicial...Yes it is true that a settlement is not a judicial precedent.<BR/><BR/>But it's still a good thing.raybeckermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-1160793472752029872006-10-13T22:37:00.000-04:002006-10-13T22:37:00.000-04:00it's my understanding that, without actual judgeme...it's my understanding that, without actual judgements being handed down, settling actual has the unwanted (in this case) side effect of not establishing a precedence. <BR/><BR/>In other words, "officially" no blunder occurred and can't be submitted in future proceedings.<BR/><BR/>Is this true?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com