tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post1577915090085056048..comments2024-02-29T03:26:17.906-05:00Comments on Recording Industry vs The People: Prof. Mike O'Donnell of University of Chicago Questions Premise of RIAA Ex Parte Applicationsraybeckermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-88388621179645417292007-07-20T16:47:00.000-04:002007-07-20T16:47:00.000-04:00I was trying to explain this to someone and thinki...I was trying to explain this to someone and thinking of a different analogy than the phone one, and I came up with one. The IP address is sort of like your seat you get on a plane with your ticket. Every flight, you get a different seat, and sometimes someone may take your seat. You can also change seats and the records would still show the old number. Maybe the defense should start trying to use a different analogy also so the "phone number" one doesn't stick.<BR/><BR/>mehmhoyes62https://www.blogger.com/profile/11293451019293309060noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-86472803017943972292007-07-16T13:27:00.000-04:002007-07-16T13:27:00.000-04:00Mike O'Donnell is right! IP addresses don't prove...Mike O'Donnell is right! IP addresses don't prove one's indentity! I have known this for quite some time, and I questioned the RIAA's practice on this from the get-go. He admitted what Gary Millin admitted in BMG Canada v John Doe. I think that RIAA should be required to put a mechanism in place for dealing with mistaken indentity. I personally beleive that RIAA should end this campaign all together.StephenHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14106243367366411553noreply@blogger.com