tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post4903872387812856407..comments2024-03-22T03:28:24.897-04:00Comments on Recording Industry vs The People: Ms. Stubbs Opposes RIAA's "Renewed" Motion to Dismiss Counterclaimsraybeckermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-473031046541672082007-05-11T17:47:00.000-04:002007-05-11T17:47:00.000-04:00Comes now the Defendant Mrs. Tallie Stubbs (herein...Comes now the Defendant Mrs. Tallie Stubbs (hereinafter “Mrs. Stubbs”) and states the<BR/>following objections and response to Plaintiffs’ <B>One Hundredth</B> Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims filed...<BR/><BR/>(bold text for those who might have missed the intent otherwise on a quick read through.)<BR/><BR/>Btw, a covenant to not sue could hardly be expected to provide the future legal immunity to <B>other claims by other Plaintiff's</B> (e.g. individual record companies) relying on the same weak evidence to harass someone who fights back that a judgment of non-infringement would offer. Clearly if Plaintiff's truly believed there was no difference between them in actual effect, they wouldn't protest so strongly in favoring one over the other.AMD FanBoihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864029976202105778noreply@blogger.com