tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post6840168763075019758..comments2024-03-22T03:28:24.897-04:00Comments on Recording Industry vs The People: Matthew Oppenheim admitted pro hac vice in Capitol Records v. Thomas, further papers filedraybeckermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-34292757944324170852009-06-10T16:48:19.943-04:002009-06-10T16:48:19.943-04:00Just want to echo crmanriq's second point -- t...Just want to echo crmanriq's second point -- the defendant's briefs are written with exceptional clarity, at least to this layman's eyes. That has to count for something.Scotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14341576498315327700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-80710075223466219852009-06-10T16:30:03.457-04:002009-06-10T16:30:03.457-04:00Non-lawyer asking a few questions:
1) The scheduli...Non-lawyer asking a few questions:<br />1) The scheduling order referenced in the plaintiffs exhibit list makes no mention of submission of said list. The May 20 Notice of Trial states that all exhibits shall have been produced on or before June 1. What is the chance of defendant getting motion granted denying use of documents not in their possession as of June 1?<br /><br />2) Is it just me or do defendants attorneys write very very well? They make their points in plain convincing language.<br /><br />3) Is it usual to see this much last minute back and forth, or is this due to the late entry of Camara, or another factor?Gamer Curmudgeonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15359221737037432744noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-35458360959970382112009-06-10T16:21:46.677-04:002009-06-10T16:21:46.677-04:00Guess I'll get to see Mr. Oppenheim again come...Guess I'll get to see Mr. Oppenheim again come Monday.Marc W. Bourgeoishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01576505039183403754noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-9194475721484648072009-06-10T15:57:38.925-04:002009-06-10T15:57:38.925-04:00It will be interesting to see what role, if any, M...It will be interesting to see what role, if any, Mr Oppenheim plays at trial. On its face, it seems like a tactic to help shield him from deposition as the client rep in future litigation a la Tenenbaum. And that just makes me wonder even more what he has to hide...<br /><br />lost in thoughtAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com