tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post7025047683774677649..comments2024-03-22T03:28:24.897-04:00Comments on Recording Industry vs The People: Prof. Nesson admitted pro hac vice in Capitol v Thomas-Rassetraybeckermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-37220870336286797182010-11-04T13:18:12.518-04:002010-11-04T13:18:12.518-04:00I deleted a comment for violation of my comment po...I deleted a comment for violation of my <a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2007/07/comment-policies-for-recording-industry.html%22" rel="nofollow">comment policies</a>. It would have to be reworded to be accepted.raybeckermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-46288615028222005082010-11-03T16:15:53.372-04:002010-11-03T16:15:53.372-04:00I know this is Federal court, but I'm pretty s...I know this is Federal court, but I'm pretty sure state court in Minnesota wouldn't have been held. For example, process cannot be served on Election Day in Minnesota, the Minnesota Constitution says that civil warrants cannot be executed on Election Day, etc. I don't know for sure whether jurors can be required to serve in state court on Election Day in Minnesota, but since employers are required by law to allow employees sufficient time off to vote, that would seem a logical extension.<br /><br />AndrewAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-8792784783293467162010-11-01T11:47:28.576-04:002010-11-01T11:47:28.576-04:00Yeah, trial on election day? I would have been in...Yeah, trial on election day? I would have been interested in attending if I didn't have obligations as a chief election inspector in Wisconsin.Marc W. Bourgeoishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01576505039183403754noreply@blogger.com