tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post8691909732786594034..comments2024-03-22T03:28:24.897-04:00Comments on Recording Industry vs The People: RIAA Tries to Make New Submission in opposition to UMG v. Lindor In Limine Motionraybeckermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-33066138143324312252007-05-26T20:58:00.000-04:002007-05-26T20:58:00.000-04:00thats why i started it with " no need to publish t...thats why i started it with "<I> no need to publish this post!</I>"<BR/>I thought of it more as a tip for your "Commentary & discussion:" link section above.<BR/><BR/>Never mind ;-)Alter_Fritzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10861406779872744163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-417816933624347312007-05-26T20:51:00.000-04:002007-05-26T20:51:00.000-04:00That's not news, Alter_Fritz. They bring those Joh...That's not news, Alter_Fritz. They bring those John Doe cases every day.<BR/><BR/>The news is that Joe Hazelbaker is challenging them.raybeckermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-30771898206357614342007-05-26T19:20:00.000-04:002007-05-26T19:20:00.000-04:00no need to publish this post!have you seen this?ht...no need to publish this post!<BR/><BR/><BR/>have you seen this?<BR/><BR/>http://www.studentlegalrights.org/attorneys.shtml<BR/>"RIAA Files Lawsuit in Columbus Federal Court Against Unknown Individuals Using Ohio University's Server<BR/><BR/>The RIAA has filed a lawsuit againt the following 10 IP addresses that are affiliated with Ohio University:<BR/><BR/>132.235.106.36 2007-02-07 15:14:48 EST<BR/><BR/>132.235.151.68 2007-01-18 10:14:03 EST<BR/><BR/>64.247.104.212 2007-01-16 02:14:14 EST<BR/><BR/>64.247.106.158 2007-01-17 00:00:44 EST<BR/><BR/>64.247.107.48 2007-02-07 06:35:07 EST<BR/><BR/>64.247.107.88 2007-01-21 06:13:00 EST<BR/><BR/>64.247.120.44 2007-01-31 23:20:16 EST<BR/><BR/>64.247.70.176 2007-01-19 04:53:37 EST<BR/><BR/>64.247.76.60 2007-02-02 22:36:54 EST<BR/><BR/>64.247.94.81 2007-01-19 04:07:41 EST<BR/><BR/><BR/>If you received a Pre-Litigation Settlement letter from the RIAA associated with one of these IP addresses, it is advisable to begin seeking legal representation. Please read the postings below with information about available attorneys. You can also find a list of attorneys nationwide at http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/<BR/><BR/>Click here to see the complaint filed in court and the exhibit list containing the IP addresses. The files are in PDF format. "Alter_Fritzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10861406779872744163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-46636822825030644722007-05-23T20:54:00.000-04:002007-05-23T20:54:00.000-04:00Yes, amd.... the RIAA has done a lot of frivolous ...Yes, amd.... the RIAA has done a lot of frivolous things. Sooner or later it's going to catch up with them.raybeckermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-58197785493581592522007-05-23T20:53:00.000-04:002007-05-23T20:53:00.000-04:00I rejected a comment because it had a profanity in...I rejected a comment because it had a profanity in it. Sorry.<BR/><BR/>There's something fishy about the Heslep case. I never heard anything about the case until the RIAA trotted out this decision.raybeckermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-72588460407270717212007-05-23T19:40:00.000-04:002007-05-23T19:40:00.000-04:00It's baffling how the RIAA would consider this in ...It's baffling how the RIAA would consider this in any way to be related to the in limine motion!<BR/><BR/>But I am curious about the order by the Texas judge. If I understand Grokster, the defendants were actively encouraging and profiting over infringement and so were held liable for that reason. There's no evidence that Heslep actively encouraged nor profited, and the judge admits there's only evidence of secondary infringement at the specific time mentioned by the RIAA complaint. Grokster says secondary infringement is a common-law offense, and not covered by copyright law. OK, so someone please explain to me why this isn't a common-law matter to be heard in small claims court (actual damages ~$0.70/song) or at most in a state court?Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01245521721355936477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-38370420001056206142007-05-23T17:24:00.000-04:002007-05-23T17:24:00.000-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Alter_Fritzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10861406779872744163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-30650998476346495972007-05-23T17:19:00.000-04:002007-05-23T17:19:00.000-04:00Let's walk through this:1) A case is shown where a...Let's walk through this:<BR/><BR/>1) A case is shown where an attorney was sanctioned for filing a frivolous motion with the court.<BR/><BR/>2) The RIAA has just filed a frivolous, sharp practice, completely irrelevant, motion with this court.<BR/><BR/>3) Pull out gun, aim at foot.AMD FanBoihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864029976202105778noreply@blogger.com