Ms. Stubbs has filed opposition papers to the RIAA's "renewed" motion to dismiss counterclaims in Warner v. Stubbs.
Defendant's Objections to Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
Defendant is represented by Marilyn Barringer-Thomson, the same attorney who represents Debbie Foster in Capitol v. Foster.
* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation
Keywords: digital copyright online download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs
Comes now the Defendant Mrs. Tallie Stubbs (hereinafter “Mrs. Stubbs”) and states the
ReplyDeletefollowing objections and response to Plaintiffs’ One Hundredth Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims filed...
(bold text for those who might have missed the intent otherwise on a quick read through.)
Btw, a covenant to not sue could hardly be expected to provide the future legal immunity to other claims by other Plaintiff's (e.g. individual record companies) relying on the same weak evidence to harass someone who fights back that a judgment of non-infringement would offer. Clearly if Plaintiff's truly believed there was no difference between them in actual effect, they wouldn't protest so strongly in favoring one over the other.