tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post2716957898137580415..comments2024-03-22T03:28:24.897-04:00Comments on Recording Industry vs The People: Defendant fights back in Charleston, South Carolina, in Atlantic v. Njuguna, Defends her Counterclaimsraybeckermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-9890290323205946262007-09-13T12:45:00.000-04:002007-09-13T12:45:00.000-04:00This is a very nicely written document, and well w...This is a very nicely written document, and well worth the read. It ranks up there with the letter from the California lawyer offering to provide a airplane to the RIAA lawyer so that said lawyer could easily come out to where the case would actually be litigated<BR/><BR/>Overall, one has the feeling that the RIAA is running a "protection racket". Consider:<BR/><BR/>20th Century: You've got a nice store here. Be a shame if anything happened to it. We're the good guys and I'm here to help you. Pay me hundreds now and it will save you thousands in costs later. You don't want to be the example of defying us now, do you?<BR/><BR/>21st Century: You've got a nice life here. Be a shame if anything happened to it. We're the good guys and I'm here to help you. Pay our Settlement Support Center now, and it will save you tens of thousands in costs later. You don't want to be the example of defying us now, do you?<BR/><BR/>At minimum, the RIAA owes this Defendant both all her legal fees, AND A REFUND for the amount of money she spent buying an UNNECESSARY NEW COMPUTER after they terrorized her into it in an attempt to avoid violating the law.<BR/><BR/>Nice the way this Defense lawyer takes on the RIAA <I>Noerr-Pennington</I> doctrine head on. The RIAA has been hiding behind that fig leaf for far too long.AMD FanBoihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864029976202105778noreply@blogger.com