tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post5207088572514656866..comments2024-03-22T03:28:24.897-04:00Comments on Recording Industry vs The People: RIAA Drops Case in Which it Pursued High School Student on 24-hours' noticeraybeckermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-13237706702741277602007-04-28T00:20:00.000-04:002007-04-28T00:20:00.000-04:00Aye, just because the RIAA has the OPTION of refil...Aye, just because the RIAA has the OPTION of refiling that does not mean they will.Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01015776048708755293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-49334463514385099922007-04-27T06:25:00.000-04:002007-04-27T06:25:00.000-04:00jbrooks.... you're absolutely right....jbrooks.... you're absolutely right....raybeckermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-83962133099698146232007-04-25T23:41:00.000-04:002007-04-25T23:41:00.000-04:00The defendant didn't have to agree to the stipulat...The defendant didn't have to agree to the stipulation but could have filed a brief in opposition. If the record companies refile, the defendant can again answer and counterclaim. <BR/><BR/>Given the options available to the defendant and knowing nothing about defendants decision making process and other relevant circumstances to that process, how can anyone criticize defendant for stipulating to dismissal without prejudice?jbrookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17204163190522131538noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-61741285347207470192007-04-25T17:10:00.000-04:002007-04-25T17:10:00.000-04:00It still leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Does any...It still leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Does anyone know if J. Goodwille Pierre's involvement was pro bono?<BR/><BR/>P.S. Some of the Word Verification character strings are getting as long as the posts!Jadeichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02621372649607340215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-64169111602016663582007-04-25T16:25:00.000-04:002007-04-25T16:25:00.000-04:00Without Prejudice:So they skip away yet again, abl...Without Prejudice:<BR/><BR/>So they skip away yet again, able to re-file at will, carryover all information they received the first time, and not have to pay damages to someone when their case is so weak that they wouldn't take it through to court.<BR/><BR/>Ray,<BR/><BR/>Can they run past a Statute of Limitations if they don't re-file again reasonably soon?AMD FanBoihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864029976202105778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-71946966501822399982007-04-25T16:21:00.000-04:002007-04-25T16:21:00.000-04:00This is not a fair deal. Because they dropped it ...This is not a fair deal. Because they dropped it "without prejudice, this kid could be sued again,StephenHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14106243367366411553noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-16838307528591801282007-04-25T16:05:00.000-04:002007-04-25T16:05:00.000-04:00This seems like a ploy to bring the case again lat...This seems like a ploy to bring the case again later and not be faced with a tight deadline to depose the HS kid.Igorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09007978718967707816noreply@blogger.com