tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post6256804890965698488..comments2024-03-22T03:28:24.897-04:00Comments on Recording Industry vs The People: Magistrate Judge Denies Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses on Record Company Employees' Use of P2P to Transmit Songs to Radio Stationsraybeckermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-71410405639308757452007-02-17T12:02:00.000-05:002007-02-17T12:02:00.000-05:00Dear billbI hope you're not directing that questio...Dear billb<BR/><BR/>I hope you're not directing that question to me.raybeckermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-5046439541615083232007-02-16T21:10:00.000-05:002007-02-16T21:10:00.000-05:00What's the next move then? File for reconsideratio...What's the next move then? File for reconsideration? Something else?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-28812601638198331102007-02-16T17:06:00.000-05:002007-02-16T17:06:00.000-05:00I do not know what prior rulings he is referring t...I do not know what prior rulings he is referring to.<BR/><BR/>The only prior ruling was at the conference on July 25th. <BR/><BR/>That day one thing we discussed was interrogatory number 5 and document request number 4 relating to plaintiffs' <I>employees'</I> use of p2p file sharing. At the conference I agreed to limit it to plaintiffs' employees' use of p2p file sharing to send song files to radio stations. Mr. Gabriel said he would have to check with his clients to see if they agreed to it. The judge said 'no, it's not necessary for you to check with your client, I'm ordering it'.<BR/><BR/>So I am as baffled as you are.raybeckermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-65855732070691805172007-02-16T16:03:00.000-05:002007-02-16T16:03:00.000-05:00[...]for the reasons set forth in my prior rulings...<I>[...]for the reasons set forth in my prior rulings and in plaintiffs letter opposition dated<BR/>September 13, 2007.</I><BR/><BR/>Ok, I found the September letter * but what prior rulings does the Honorable Judge Levy refer to?<BR/><BR/>* http://www.ilrweb.com/viewILRPDF.asp?filename=umg_lindor_060913RIAAtoMagis<BR/> <BR/>__<BR/>Alter_FritzAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com