tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post8980553476703996641..comments2024-03-22T03:28:24.897-04:00Comments on Recording Industry vs The People: Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Filed in New Indianapolis Case, Priority v. Vinesraybeckermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11063235302436280455noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15479871.post-9592609925035563792008-03-03T10:33:00.000-05:002008-03-03T10:33:00.000-05:00The Defendant should add that the Plaintiffs are u...The Defendant should add that the Plaintiffs are unable to prove their claims under any foreseeable set of circumstances. The "evidence" they have to this point is illegally gathered due to a lack of proper licensing of their investigators, they cannot identify a specific computer or user with it, the declarations of their so-called "experts" are deeply flawed and full of holes and inconsistencies, and even if Plaintiffs were to find the apparent infringing computer, they are unable under any circumstances to determine who was using it, or that it ever transferred files to anyone INCLUDING their investigators, since no logs of any such activity are kept by the software alleged to have been in use at the time. As such, Defendant should not be required to spend enormous amounts of money defending a claim that cannot prevail at trial.<BR/><BR/>-DMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com