The RIAA filed an "errata" in Warner v. Stubbs, correcting its prior motion to dismiss its own case.
"Errata" Correcting RIAA's Motion to Dismiss*
In its initial motion it had said it was moving "without prejudice" in several places, but in its final "ad damnum" clause asked the judge to dismiss "with prejudice".
"Without prejudice" means they could sue again at a later time for the same thing.
"With prejudice" means they could not sue again for the same thing, and that the case is totally closed.
* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation
Keywords: digital copyright online download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs
No comments:
Post a Comment
The RIAA has a habit of citing our blog to judges, so please keep comments dignified and worthy of the important issues we are discussing, in keeping with our comment policies. If you see a violation of the policies, please let me know by email. You can post anonymously, but must sign off by giving us something to call you. Conversations among several people called "Anonymous" get too confusing. Thanks. Best regards. -Ray