Thursday, April 17, 2008

Defendant in Indiana case, Priority v. Vines, files reply brief in support of motion to dismiss, cites Barker, London-Sire

In Priority v. Vines, an Indianapolis case against an Indiana University student, the defendant has filed a reply brief citing Elektra v. Barker and London-Sire v. Doe, both of which agreed with Atlantic v. Brennan in rejecting the RIAA's "making available" theory.

Defendant's reply brief in support of motion to dismiss*

* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation



Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property

at

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousApril 17, 2008 at 5:13:00 PM EDT

    Simple, concise, elegant, deadly. The Plaintiffs have no case because they can allege no valid cause of action.

    -DM

    ReplyDelete
  2. raybeckermanApril 17, 2008 at 11:15:00 PM EDT

    Several confusing comments rejected for different reasons.

    ReplyDelete

The RIAA has a habit of citing our blog to judges, so please keep comments dignified and worthy of the important issues we are discussing, in keeping with our comment policies. If you see a violation of the policies, please let me know by email. You can post anonymously, but must sign off by giving us something to call you. Conversations among several people called "Anonymous" get too confusing. Thanks. Best regards. -Ray