Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Motions in Capitol v. Thomas-Rasset: one granted, one denied

Motion of defense to require that the sound recordings placed in evidence be certified copies of the deposit copies placed with the copyright office denied.

Motion to exclude exhibit 4 (chains of title for corporations, name changes-mergers-etc) granted.

June 16, 2009, Order, sustaining objection to registration documents, overruling objection to uncertain sound recordings and parol evidence

Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

3 comments:

  1. So, where does it leave the plaintiffs? They have no proof that they own the copyright.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Plaintiffs will have to attempt to prove ownership with testimony. We will see how this goes and whether or not the defense objects.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is there any chance Defence won't object?

    XYZZY

    ReplyDelete

The RIAA has a habit of citing our blog to judges, so please keep comments dignified and worthy of the important issues we are discussing, in keeping with our comment policies. If you see a violation of the policies, please let me know by email. You can post anonymously, but must sign off by giving us something to call you. Conversations among several people called "Anonymous" get too confusing. Thanks. Best regards. -Ray