The defendant's motion asking for audio recording of further proceedings in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum was denied. The Court's order said: "Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered denying [839] Motion to digitally audio record the public hearing before the Court on June 5, 2009, and all further public proceedings by Joel Tenenbaum. (Gaudet, Jennifer)?
Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player
Legal issues arising from the RIAA's lawsuits of intimidation brought against ordinary working people, and other important internet law issues. Provided by Ray Beckerman, P.C.
Monday, June 08, 2009
Tenenbaum motion for audio recording denied
2 comments:
The RIAA has a habit of citing our blog to judges, so please keep comments dignified and worthy of the important issues we are discussing, in keeping with our comment policies. If you see a violation of the policies, please let me know by email. You can post anonymously, but must sign off by giving us something to call you. Conversations among several people called "Anonymous" get too confusing. Thanks. Best regards. -Ray
Well, the order only reads "by Joel Tenenbaum". this does NOT preclude Judge Gertner from further ordering the courtreporter to make an audiorecording for the purpose of the courtreporters business and order that the tapes be kept in secure esrow by that reporter instead of being reused.
ReplyDeleteThat way, while not disobeying the 1st circuit decision, there will be a record for "further generations" once the case is over non the less.
Quick - pass me that bushel before someone catches sight (or sound) of what we have going on here.
ReplyDelete