In Capitol Records v. Thomas-Rasset, the trial has been scheduled for October 4th.
This will be the third trial in the matter, the first verdict having been overturned due to an incorrect jury instruction, the second having been overturned due to the unreasonableness of the size of the award. This trial will relate only to the measure of damages.
Notice of Trial Date
Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player
Legal issues arising from the RIAA's lawsuits of intimidation brought against ordinary working people, and other important internet law issues. Provided by Ray Beckerman, P.C.
Friday, March 05, 2010
Capitol v Thomas Round 3 scheduled for October
4 comments:
The RIAA has a habit of citing our blog to judges, so please keep comments dignified and worthy of the important issues we are discussing, in keeping with our comment policies. If you see a violation of the policies, please let me know by email. You can post anonymously, but must sign off by giving us something to call you. Conversations among several people called "Anonymous" get too confusing. Thanks. Best regards. -Ray
Correct me if I'm wrong, please.
ReplyDeleteThe verdict of the second trial will stand - this third trial is only to determine damages awarded from the second... right?
- xox
Yes you are correct.
ReplyDeleteActually I should have mentioned that in my post; will correct it now. Thanks.
Since Jammie Thomas-Rasset works on a reservation and is a Native American, how would they even collect on that judgment? Sheriffs generally do not have any jurisdiction on reservations and if the tribal council fights it there isn't much that can be done about it. The only group that has any real authority are federal agents and as a rule they do not like going on to reservations.
ReplyDeleteThis "file" will determine damages?
ReplyDelete