Thursday, April 17, 2008

Defendant in Indiana case, Priority v. Vines, files reply brief in support of motion to dismiss, cites Barker, London-Sire

In Priority v. Vines, an Indianapolis case against an Indiana University student, the defendant has filed a reply brief citing Elektra v. Barker and London-Sire v. Doe, both of which agreed with Atlantic v. Brennan in rejecting the RIAA's "making available" theory.

Defendant's reply brief in support of motion to dismiss*

* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation



Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Simple, concise, elegant, deadly. The Plaintiffs have no case because they can allege no valid cause of action.

-DM

Ray Beckerman said...

Several confusing comments rejected for different reasons.